Brexit

If the House members are voting against the many different options are wanting THEIR ideas accepted, then it is clear by now that there isn't any easy majority for them. If they're worried that voting FOR something might cause them to lose votes in the next election, then nothing could ever be achieved because the Brexit idea cuts across all parties. In the case of people not getting their own ideas, there are two options awaiting them: hard Brexit or revocation of Article 50 (so they can remain in the EU). Waiting for that choice is a huge gamble for either side. In the latter case of voter worries, they will never work out a good deal and it would have to be returned to the public to vote for another solution. But, if they vote again it would ruin the idea that the first vote was meaningful. No, that won't happen. Again, it leads to the two radical possibilities: a hard Brexit or revocation of Aritcle 50.

So, each side, meaning both Tories and Labour and Brexit Leavers and Remainers, have to look at this hard choice and wonder who is able to make that one 'vote'. Isn't it PM May? Do they trust they will get what they want based on things she has said. She seems dedicated to Leaving as the referendum outcome indicated, so it seems obvious that will be the choice. Are the Remainers really satisfied with that? So far they haven't shown any ability to avoid it. It seems clear that Leave it will be and a HARD Brexit at that. Welcome to the WTO.